Philadelphia Inquirer Executive Editor Resigns After Publication of "Buildings of Matter, Also"

Philadelphia Inquirer Executive Editor Resigns After Publication of “Buildings of Matter, Also”

According to a memo from publisher Lisa Hughes, Stan Wisnowski worked with the inquirer for 20 years, and was her executive editor for ten years. He is also Senior Vice President.

Hughes said in the memo that Vishnovsky’s last day will be on June 12.

No successor has been appointed to the position of executive editor.

Wichenovsky’s resignation comes after an uproar from Inquirer’s staff over the title of an article published on Tuesday about concerns that historic buildings might be damaged during protests over George Floyd’s death while in Minneapolis police custody.

Wischnowski refused to comment on the inquirer about his story that announced his resignation and did not respond to an email request from CNN for comment.

The journalists called the sick protest

More than 40 journalists of the newspaper colored people called the sick on Thursday, according to the patient’s organizers.

Washington's New Black Life Street mural is taken in satellite

The 44 journalists signed an open letter to their editors explaining their decision to summon “sick and exhausted.” They said they spent “months and years” trying to win the public’s confidence only “to erode it in an instant through indifferent and unemotional decisions.”

Wischnowski, along with Inquirer Gabriel Escobar editor and managing director Patrick Kerkstra, signed on Apology After the procedure of the staff.

Review the title process sheet

Senior editors said in the apology that the title was “unacceptable” although it went through the editing process and writing the title.

The editorial wrote in the apology, “The headline was attacked on the Black Life movement, and he proposed an equation between the loss of buildings and the lives of black Americans. This is unacceptable.”

The research will review the process of “applying precautions to report sensitive content and prevent individual publishing,” and the apology continued.

The newspaper said in a tweet on Thursday that the title was “offensive and inappropriate” and should not have been printed.

“We will expand our commitment to build a newsroom that better reflects the community it serves, with more resources and requirements for the final diverse gatherings,” the apology said. “We will define the process for reporting, discussing, and publicly disclosing vulnerabilities in editorial judgments that have not been addressed with a simple factual correction.”

Hughes said the newspaper will continue to look at its operations while looking for a new executive editor. “We will use this moment to assess the organizational structure and processes in the newsroom, assess what we need, and search internally and externally for an experienced leader who embodies our values, embraces our common strategy, and understands the diversity of societies that the memo said from Hughes.

The mistake came in the same week that the New York Times was criticized by some of its employees for publishing an editorial entitled Tom Cotton: Send Forces. By Republican Senator Tom Cotton, arguing that the army should be sent to quell urban protests and “restore order”.
The Times responded before Adding Editor’s Note That read, “After the publication, this article faced severe criticism from many readers (and many of its colleagues in Times), which prompted editors to review the article and the editing process. Based on that review, we concluded that the article was below our standards and should not have been Publish it. ”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *